2003 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.7 V8 (340 Hp) 2003Overall Score78.75/100
2003 Holden UTE vs 2003 Hummer H2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Hummer
H2
Hummer H2 6.0i V8 (321 Hp) 2003Overall Score78.5/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHummer H2
HoldenMakeHummer
UTEModelH2
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeOff-road araç, SUV
2Seats4
2Doors5
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHummer H2
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
340 HPPower321 HP
470 NmTorque488 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Holden UTESpecificationHummer H2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank121 lt
—Urban consumption25 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHummer H2
5052 mmLength4820 mm
1844 mmWidth2063 mm
1476 mmHeight2080 mm
—Weight2901 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase3118 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Holden UTE and 2003 Hummer H2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableHummer H2 vs Holden UTE2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableInfiniti QX56 vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Armada vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableSaab 9-7X vs Holden UTE2005 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…