1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 AC Cobra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 5.0 V8 (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score77.5/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
77.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationAC Cobra
HoldenMakeAC
UTEModelCobra
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationAC Cobra
—0–100 km/h5,3 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
265 HPPower225 HP
430 NmTorque579 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationAC Cobra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/60 R15Tyre size225/65 VR15
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationAC Cobra
4861 mmLength4200 mm
1794 mmWidth1746 mm
1450 mmHeight1200 mm
1450 KgWeight980 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2285 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden UTE and 2000 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Tahoe vs Holden UTE1999 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model yearsVSImage unavailableAC Cobra vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Sequoia vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Econoline vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…