2000 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 5.0 V8 (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score77.5/100
2000 AC Cobra vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
77.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC CobraSpecificationHolden UTE
ACMakeHolden
CobraModelUTE
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typePick-up
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
AC CobraSpecificationHolden UTE
5,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
225 HPPower265 HP
579 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
AC CobraSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/65 VR15Tyre size225/60 R15
Dimensions
AC CobraSpecificationHolden UTE
4200 mmLength4861 mm
1746 mmWidth1794 mm
1200 mmHeight1450 mm
980 KgWeight1450 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 AC Cobra and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…