2000 • Toyota
Sequoia
Toyota Sequoia 4.7 V8 32V (243 Hp) 2000Overall Score77.5/100
2000 Toyota Sequoia vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
77.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota SequoiaSpecificationHolden UTE
ToyotaMakeHolden
SequoiaModelUTE
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Toyota SequoiaSpecificationHolden UTE
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
243 HPPower265 HP
427 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota SequoiaSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
99 ltFuel tank80 lt
23 ltUrban consumption—
13,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota SequoiaSpecificationHolden UTE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/70 R16Tyre size225/60 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota SequoiaSpecificationHolden UTE
5180 mmLength4861 mm
1980 mmWidth1794 mm
1860 mmHeight1450 mm
2300 KgWeight1450 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Sequoia and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…