2000 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
2000 Holden UTE vs 1999 Holden UTE Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Holden UTE
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
HoldenMakeHolden
UTEModelUTE
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
265 HPPower265 HP
430 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/60 R15Tyre size225/60 R15
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationHolden UTE
4861 mmLength4861 mm
1794 mmWidth1794 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1450 KgWeight1450 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2731 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden UTE and 1999 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Tahoe vs Holden UTE2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs Holden UTE2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHSV Clubsport vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableLincoln Navigator vs Holden UTE1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…