1999 • Holden
UTE
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 32V VR-6 (265 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
1999 Holden UTE vs 2000 Dodge Dakota Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Dodge
Dakota
Dodge Dakota 4.7 V8 (238 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Dodge Dakota
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden UTESpecificationDodge Dakota
HoldenMakeDodge
UTEModelDakota
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats6
2Doors4
Performance
Holden UTESpecificationDodge Dakota
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4981 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
265 HPPower238 HP
430 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Holden UTESpecificationDodge Dakota
4861 mmLength5463 mm
1794 mmWidth1818 mm
1450 mmHeight1699 mm
1450 KgWeight—
2731 mmWheelbase3227 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Holden UTE and 2000 Dodge Dakota approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Tahoe vs Holden UTE1999 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHolden UTE vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableAC Cobra vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Sequoia vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Econoline vs Holden UTE2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…