2000 • Holden
Combo
Holden Combo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Holden Combo vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Holden Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden ComboSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
HoldenMakeVolkswagen
ComboModelPolo
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Holden ComboSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
106 HPPower97 HP
148 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden ComboSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Holden ComboSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/45 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden ComboSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4015 mmLength4164 mm
1610 mmWidth1640 mm
—Height1414 mm
1105 KgWeight1100 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2441 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden Combo and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…