DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Corsa vs 2000 Holden Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
CorsaModelCombo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
177 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
92 HPPower106 HP
127 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3730 mmLength4015 mm
1610 mmWidth1610 mm
1390 mmHeight—
975 KgWeight1105 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Corsa and 2000 Holden Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…