2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Holden Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Combo
Holden Combo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Holden Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationHolden Combo
VolkswagenMakeHolden
PoloModelCombo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationHolden Combo
11,1 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower106 HP
152 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationHolden Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationHolden Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationHolden Combo
4164 mmLength4015 mm
1640 mmWidth1610 mm
1414 mmHeight—
1100 KgWeight1105 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Holden Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…