2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Citroen Xsara vs 2000 Holden Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Combo
Holden Combo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Holden Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationHolden Combo
CitroenMakeHolden
XsaraModelCombo
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationHolden Combo
15,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
177 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower106 HP
153 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationHolden Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank46 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationHolden Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationHolden Combo
4167 mmLength4015 mm
1698 mmWidth1610 mm
1405 mmHeight—
1070 KgWeight1105 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Holden Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…