2000 • Holden
Combo
Holden Combo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Holden Combo vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Holden Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden ComboSpecificationCitroen Xsara
HoldenMakeCitroen
ComboModelXsara
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Holden ComboSpecificationCitroen Xsara
11,0 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
106 HPPower101 HP
148 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden ComboSpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Holden ComboSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/45 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden ComboSpecificationCitroen Xsara
4015 mmLength4167 mm
1610 mmWidth1698 mm
—Height1405 mm
1105 KgWeight1070 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden Combo and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…