1982 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.0 (105 Hp) 1982Overall Score55.5/100
1982 Ford Sierra vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1981 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 1.6 N (75 Hp) 1981Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Ford Sierra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford SierraSpecificationOpel Ascona
FordMakeOpel
SierraModelAscona
1982Model year1981
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford SierraSpecificationOpel Ascona
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford SierraSpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford SierraSpecificationOpel Ascona
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size195/60 R14
Dimensions
Ford SierraSpecificationOpel Ascona
4425 mmLength4366 mm
1694 mmWidth1668 mm
1407 mmHeight1395 mm
1600 KgWeight980 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2574 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Ford Sierra and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…