1982 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 GLE (110 Hp) 1982Overall Score55.25/100
1982 Audi 80 vs 1982 Ford Sierra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Ford
Sierra
Ford Sierra 2.0 (105 Hp) 1982Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Ford Sierra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
80ModelSierra
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3/5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
10,2 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
110 HPPower105 HP
137 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationFord Sierra
4383 mmLength4425 mm
1682 mmWidth1694 mm
1365 mmHeight1407 mm
930 KgWeight1600 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2608 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 80 and 1982 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…