DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
100ModelSierra
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
12,9 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1921 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
146 NmTorque0 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationFord Sierra
4683 mmLength4425 mm
1768 mmWidth1694 mm
1390 mmHeight1407 mm
1170 KgWeight1600 Kg
2677 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…