DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 Opel Ascona vs 1982 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Ascona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFord
AsconaModelSierra
1981Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2/4Doors3/5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1979 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
110 HPPower105 HP
159 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/70 R13Tyre size—

Dimensions

4321 mmLength4425 mm
1670 mmWidth1694 mm
1380 mmHeight1407 mm
980 KgWeight1600 Kg
2518 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 Opel Ascona and 1982 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…