1999 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 1999Overall Score61.5/100
1999 Ford Ranger vs 2000 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Ranger
FordMakeFord
RangerModelRanger
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
266 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Ranger
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Ranger
5020 mmLength5020 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1750 mmHeight1750 mm
1399 KgWeight1399 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Ranger and 2000 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDodge Caravan vs Ford Ranger1999 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota Mark II vs Ford Ranger1999 and 1999 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Ford Ranger1999 and 1999 model years
VSMitsubishi Delica vs Ford Ranger1999 and 1999 model yearsVSFord Ranger vs Ford Ranger2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…