DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Dodge Caravan vs 2000 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
CaravanModelRanger
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
116 HPPower109 HP
262 NmTorque266 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4733 mmLength5020 mm
1920 mmWidth1695 mm
1740 mmHeight1750 mm
1870 KgWeight1399 Kg
2878 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Dodge Caravan and 2000 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…