2000 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Ford Ranger vs 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 TD 4x4 (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
RESULT
Tie
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.
62.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL 200
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
0 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
109 HPPower100 HP
266 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
5020 mmLength4500 mm
1695 mmWidth1655 mm
1750 mmHeight1570 mm
1399 KgWeight1810 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Ranger and 2000 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDodge Caravan vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota Mark II vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Ford Ranger2000 and 2000 model years
VSFord Ranger vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2000 model years
VSJeep Cherokee vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…