DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Ranger vs 2000 Dodge Caravan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeDodge
RangerModelCaravan
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
109 HPPower116 HP
266 NmTorque262 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5020 mmLength4733 mm
1695 mmWidth1920 mm
1750 mmHeight1740 mm
1399 KgWeight1870 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Ranger and 2000 Dodge Caravan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…