2003 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.0 i 16V AWD (124 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Ford Maverick vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.0 TD (112 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Maverick
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MaverickSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
FordMakeLand Rover
MaverickModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford MaverickSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h14,4 s
166 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
124 HPPower112 HP
175 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MaverickSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MaverickSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MaverickSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4394 mmLength4368 mm
1781 mmWidth1809 mm
1722 mmHeight1708 mm
1545 KgWeight1565 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Maverick and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…