DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2003 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
Grand VitaraModelMaverick
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
109 HPPower124 HP
250 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4394 mm
—Width1781 mm
—Height1722 mm
—Weight1545 Kg
—Wheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2003 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…