DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Laguna vs 2003 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
LagunaModelMaverick
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
140 HPPower124 HP
200 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4394 mm
1772 mmWidth1781 mm
1429 mmHeight1722 mm
1300 KgWeight1545 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Laguna and 2003 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…