DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
FreelanderModelMaverick
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
112 HPPower124 HP
260 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4394 mm
1809 mmWidth1781 mm
1708 mmHeight1722 mm
1565 KgWeight1545 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…