2016 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCI (180 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • BMW
4 Serisi
BMW 4 Serisi 2016Overall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
FordMakeBMW
KugaModel4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
9,2 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
202 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
180 HPPower184 HP
400 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
4531 mmLength4638 mm
1838 mmWidth1825 mm
1703 mmHeight1384 mm
1702 KgWeight1700 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2810 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…