DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeFord
4 SerisiModelKuga
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
230 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
184 HPPower180 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4531 mm
1825 mmWidth1838 mm
1384 mmHeight1703 mm
1700 KgWeight1702 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…