DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi TT vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi TTSpecificationFord Kuga
AudiMakeFord
TTModelKuga
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Audi TTSpecificationFord Kuga
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
241 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
250 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi TTSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi TTSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi TTSpecificationFord Kuga
4177 mmLength4531 mm
1832 mmWidth1838 mm
1353 mmHeight1703 mm
1210 KgWeight1702 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi TT and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…