DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat ToroSpecificationFord Kuga
FiatMakeFord
ToroModelKuga
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Fiat ToroSpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
170 HPPower180 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat ToroSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat ToroSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/70 R16; 225/65 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Fiat ToroSpecificationFord Kuga
4915 mmLength4531 mm
1844 mmWidth1838 mm
1746 mmHeight1703 mm
1709 KgWeight1702 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…