DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi TT
FordMakeAudi
KugaModelTT
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi TT
9,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
202 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi TT
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi TT
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi TT
4531 mmLength4177 mm
1838 mmWidth1832 mm
1703 mmHeight1353 mm
1702 KgWeight1210 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…