DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi A3
FordMakeAudi
KugaModelA3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi A3
9,2 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
202 km/hTop speed232 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
180 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi A3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationAudi A3
4531 mmLength4237 mm
1838 mmWidth1777 mm
1703 mmHeight1421 mm
1702 KgWeight1230 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…