DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Toro
FordMakeFiat
KugaModelToro
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Toro
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
180 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Toro
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Toro
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationFiat Toro
4531 mmLength4915 mm
1838 mmWidth1844 mm
1703 mmHeight1746 mm
1702 KgWeight1709 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…