DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMini
KugaModelConvertible
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
195 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4531 mmLength3821 mm
1838 mmWidth1727 mm
1703 mmHeight1415 mm
1579 KgWeight1130 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…