2016 • Abarth
595
Abarth 595 1.4 T-Jet (145 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
2016 Abarth 595 vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Abarth 595SpecificationFord Kuga
AbarthMakeFord
595ModelKuga
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Abarth 595SpecificationFord Kuga
7,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
206 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Abarth 595SpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Abarth 595SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
194/45 R16Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Abarth 595SpecificationFord Kuga
3660 mmLength4531 mm
1627 mmWidth1838 mm
1485 mmHeight1703 mm
1035 KgWeight1579 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Abarth 595 and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…