DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Convertible vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
ConvertibleModelKuga
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
208 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 84HTyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3821 mmLength4531 mm
1727 mmWidth1838 mm
1415 mmHeight1703 mm
1130 KgWeight1579 Kg
2495 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Convertible and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…