DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Hatch vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
MiniMakeFord
HatchModelKuga
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
8,2 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
207 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 84HTyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
3982 mmLength4531 mm
1727 mmWidth1838 mm
1425 mmHeight1703 mm
1145 KgWeight1579 Kg
2567 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Hatch and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…