2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 1.8i (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationNissan Bluebird
FordMakeNissan
FocusModelBluebird
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationNissan Bluebird
12,4 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
184 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationNissan Bluebird
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationNissan Bluebird
4152 mmLength4470 mm
1698 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1475 mm
1183 KgWeight1270 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…