2000 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.9 (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
626ModelFocus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Focus
12,6 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
182 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
152 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank53 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 88HTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Focus
4575 mmLength4152 mm
1710 mmWidth1698 mm
1430 mmHeight1430 mm
1180 KgWeight1183 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…