DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Delica vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DelicaModelFocus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
6Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1789 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4285 mmLength4152 mm
1635 mmWidth1698 mm
1850 mmHeight1430 mm
1320 KgWeight1183 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Delica and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…