DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Premacy vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
PremacyModelFocus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
175 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
152 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank53 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4152 mm
1705 mmWidth1698 mm
1600 mmHeight1430 mm
1250 KgWeight1183 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Premacy and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…