2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Mitsubishi Delica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Delica
Mitsubishi Delica 1.8 4WD (95 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
FordMakeMitsubishi
FocusModelDelica
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1789 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
200 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank66 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Delica
4152 mmLength4285 mm
1698 mmWidth1635 mm
1430 mmHeight1850 mm
1183 KgWeight1320 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Mitsubishi Delica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…