DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2014 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
ExplorerModelLaguna
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeCoupe
7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
183 km/hTop speed244 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
249 HPPower238 HP
346 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,0 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption10,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
245/60 R18; 255/50 R20Tyre size215/50 R17; 225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4643 mm
1988 mmWidth1812 mm
1788 mmHeight1398 mm
—Weight1522 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2694 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2014 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…