DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Sedona vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sedona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
SedonaModelExplorer
2014Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
7-8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
213 km/hTop speed183 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
248 HPPower249 HP
343 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6 SelectShift
235/60 R17Tyre size245/60 R18; 255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5019 mm
1985 mmWidth1988 mm
1815 mmHeight1788 mm
2107 KgWeight—
3020 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Sedona and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sedona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…