DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Holden UTE vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden UTE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
UTEModelExplorer
2014Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,7 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
245 HPPower249 HP
330 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6 SelectShift
—Tyre size245/60 R18; 255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength5019 mm
1899 mmWidth1988 mm
1497 mmHeight1788 mm
1697 KgWeight—
3009 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Holden UTE and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden UTE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…