DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Nissan Murano vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
MuranoModelExplorer
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
210 km/hTop speed183 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
249 HPPower249 HP
334 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
X-Tronic CVTGears6 SelectShift
235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size245/60 R18; 255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength5019 mm
1885 mmWidth1988 mm
1720 mmHeight1788 mm
1790-1830 KgWeight—
2825 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Nissan Murano and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…