DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2014 Kia Sedona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sedona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeKia
ExplorerModelSedona
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeMinivan
7Seats7-8
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
183 km/hTop speed213 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
249 HPPower248 HP
346 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears5
245/60 R18; 255/50 R20Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength5130 mm
1988 mmWidth1985 mm
1788 mmHeight1815 mm
—Weight2107 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase3020 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2014 Kia Sedona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sedona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…