DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeSmart
MiToModelForfour
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement898 cc
95 HPPower109 HP
200 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6 Twinamic
195/55 R16Tyre size185/45 R17; 205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength3525 mm
1720 mmWidth1665 mm
1446 mmHeight1543 mm
1150 KgWeight1095 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2494 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…