DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Baleno vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeAlfa Romeo
BalenoModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
120 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
37 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4063 mm
1745 mmWidth1720 mm
1470 mmHeight1446 mm
865 kgWeight1150 Kg
320 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2511 mm

Additional Features

Suzuki BalenoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Baleno and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…