DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Proton Saga vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ProtonMakeAlfa Romeo
SagaModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
120 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption2,9 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4331 mmLength4063 mm
1689 mmWidth1720 mm
1491 mmHeight1446 mm
1035 KgWeight1150 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Proton Saga and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…