DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAlfa Romeo
ADModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
121 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption2,9 lt
—Average consumption3,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4063 mm
1695 mmWidth1720 mm
1500 mmHeight1446 mm
—Weight1150 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…