DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
MiToModelScenic
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4/5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
95 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
3,4 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4366 mm
1720 mmWidth1845 mm
1446 mmHeight—
1150 KgWeight1395 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…