DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2016 Perodua Bezza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakePerodua
MiToModelBezza
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4/5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1329 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
200 NmTorque121 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank36 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption—
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,4 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength4150 mm
1720 mmWidth1620 mm
1446 mmHeight1510 mm
1150 KgWeight900 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2016 Perodua Bezza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…